Illinois Rejects Graduated Income Tax Amendment


November 4, 2020




, , ,


Campaign signs smatter the roadside a few days before Election Day. [Credit: Jennifer Taylor]

(WHEATON, Ill.) —Wealthier Illinoisans will not have to pay an increased share of higher income taxes. That’s what incomplete election results showed Wednesday morning on the legislative proposal that would have amended the state’s constitution discarding the state’s flat income tax structure. The group advocating for the measure conceded with 97% of precincts reporting, showing most voters rejecting the legislative proposal.

Votes against the proposal edged out those in favor with 2,735,485 “no” votes cast (55.01%) to 2,237,103 (44.99%) in favor of the proposed graduated income tax measure.

Illinois election officials told a Chicago NBC news affiliate Tuesday night 300,000 to 400,000 ballots remained unreturned on Election Day. Ballots can be legally counted for two weeks after Election Day.

“We are undoubtedly disappointed with this result, but are proud of the millions of Illinoisans who cast their ballots in support of tax fairness in this election,” Vote Yes For Fairness Chairman Quentin Fulks said in a statement to NBC.

Lissa Druss, spokeswoman for the Coalition to Stop the Proposed Tax Hike Amendment believes the failed ballot measure is a “win for small business owners, middle-class families, family farmers, retirees, and large employers,” according to the same NBC article.

The state’s constitution currently requires all taxpayers to pay the same rate, regardless of their income. Gov. J.B. Pritzker said the so-called “fair income tax” was designed to address the state’s multi-billion-dollar budget deficit by raising taxes only on those earning more than $250,000, representing 3% of taxpayers.

Although the measure failed, constituents consistently seemed to support the measure, according to two polls conducted in March and again in September where both polls cited 67% favoring the proposal and an average of 32% opposing it.

Proponents contended the current tax system unfairly benefits millionaires and billionaires, and the proposed system would not impact the middle or working classes. They added that a new tax structure would be in line with how the federal government and the majority of other states’ tax structures. Opponents, on the other hand, argued that the amendment would give the legislature power to increase income tax rates on any group of taxpayers at will, including low-income and middle income wage earners and small business owners.

A graduated income tax allows the state to levy increasingly higher tax rates, meaning if you earn more, then you pay more.

Illinois’ individual income tax rate is currently 4.95% for all residents. According to the Institute for Illinois’ Fiscal Sustainability at the Civic Federation (IIFS), nine states in 2020 used flat rate individual general income tax structures and 32 states levied graduated individual income taxes in 2019.

Pritzker’s administration warned earlier this fall that if the graduated income tax amendment fails, citizens across the board would likely see a 20% increase in the income tax rate, which would increase the income tax amendment to nearly 6%.

Related Posts

A voter submitting their ballot.

November 20, 2022

Clean Elections USA Accused of Voter Intimidation

According to the suit filed last month, the founder of Clean Elections USA, allegedly had supporters gather at ballot boxes in Maricopa County, Arizona, with the intent to deter voters from submitting their absentee ballots.

Vote Yes for Worker's Rights yard sign

November 18, 2022

Illinois Approves Collective Bargaining Measure

Illinois voters approved constitutional Amendment 1, codifying the right to collective bargaining and prohibiting right-to-work laws in the state constitution, with more than 50 percent of voters in favor, according to The Associated Press. Known informally as the Worker’s Rights Amendment (WRA), the measure guarantees Illinois laborers the right to organize themselves, negotiate contracts, and advocate for desired wages and benefits. It further codifies the right to collective bargaining and prohibits right-to-work laws in the state constitution.